Search results
Illinois, 378 U. S. 478, we drew upon the rationale of Hamilton and Massiah in holding that the right to counsel was guaranteed at the point where the accused, prior to arraignment, was subjected to secret interrogation despite repeated requests to see his lawyer. We again noted the necessity of counsel's presence if the accused was to have a ...
Kirby v. Illinois, 406 U.S. 682 (1972), was a case decided by the Supreme Court of the United States that held that the Sixth Amendment right to counsel did not attach during a pre-indictment identification. [1]
William Shard reported to the Chicago police that two men stole his wallet. The wallet contained traveler’s checks and his social security card, among other things. The next day, two police officers stopped Thomas Kirby and his friend, Ralph Bean.
Brief Fact Summary. Willie Shard (“Mr. Shard”) had his wallet stolen while on the street in Chicago. Police arrested two men in connection with a separate offense and brought them to the police station. The police learned of the offense against Mr. Shard only upon arriving at the station.
KIRBY v. ILLINOIS CERTIORARI TO THE APPELLATE COURT OF ILLINOIS, FIRST DISTRICT No. 70-5061. Argued November 11, 1971-Reargued March 20-21, 1972-Decided June 7, 1972 Petitioner and a companion were stopped for interrogation. When each produced, in the course of demonstrating identification, items
Supreme Court of the United States. 406 U.S. 682. Kirby v. Illinois. Certiorari to the Appellate Court of Illinois, First District. No. 70-5061. Argued: November 11, 1971, and March 20-21, 1972 --- Decided: June 7, 1972. Petitioner and a companion were stopped for interrogation.
Supreme Court of the United States. 406 U.S. 682, 32 L. Ed. 2d 411, 92 S. Ct. 1877, 1972 U.S. LEXIS 49, SCDB 1971-126. No. 70-5061. 1972-06-07. Argued November 11, 1971. Reargued March 20-21, 1972. Stewart, J., announced the Court’s judgment and delivered an opinion in which Burger, C. J., and Blackmun and Rehnquist, JJ., joined.
