Search results
18 sie 2024 · CDC uses Program Evaluation to answer important questions about public health programs through methodical and intentional engagement with interest holders. This can lead to an understanding of the program, what should be evaluated, and how it should be evaluated.
- CDC Program Evaluation Framework, 2024 | MMWR - Centers for Disease ...
A practical, nonprescriptive tool, the updated 2024...
- CDC Program Evaluation Framework | Program Evaluation | CDC
CDC's Program Evaluation Framework provides a guide for...
- Program Evaluation Tip Sheet: Reach and Impact - CDC Stacks
Key considerations: Make it measurable: Impact is concrete,...
- Developing an Effective Evaluation Plan - CDC Stacks
An evaluation plan serves as a bridge between evaluation and...
- Program Evaluation and Evaluating Community Engagement
Evaluation can be classified into five types by intended...
- Measuring Implementation to Impact - CDC Stacks
The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC)...
- CDC Program Evaluation Framework, 2024 | MMWR - Centers for Disease ...
26 wrz 2024 · A practical, nonprescriptive tool, the updated 2024 framework is designed to summarize and organize essential elements of program evaluation, and can be applied at any level from individual programs to broader systems by novices and experts for planning and implementing an evaluation.
20 sie 2024 · CDC's Program Evaluation Framework provides a guide for designing and conducting evaluation across many programs and settings within and outside public health. It can be used to build evidence, understand programs, and improve evidence-based decision making.
Key considerations: Make it measurable: Impact is concrete, meaningful to stakeholders, and speaks to the value of your program. Identify a realistic level of change: Impact is how an intervention helps achieve public health goals.
An evaluation plan serves as a bridge between evaluation and program planning by highlighting program goals, clarifying measurable program objectives, and linking program activities with intended outcomes.
Evaluation can be classified into five types by intended use: formative, process, summative, outcome, and impact Formative evaluation provides informa-tion to guide program improvement, whereas process evaluation determines whether a program is delivered as intended to the targeted recipients (Rossi et al , 2004) Formative and process
The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) recommends that all CDC PD activities include six practices—sustain, design, promote, deliver, follow up, and evaluate—for optimal implementation