Search results
Facts of the case. While being held in jail, Perkins freely confessed to committing a murder to an undercover police officer who was posing as another inmate.
Perkins, 496 U.S. 292 (1990) Illinois v. Perkins. No. 88-1972. Argued Feb. 20, 1990. Decided June 4, 1990. 496 U.S. 292. Syllabus. Police placed undercover agent Parisi in a jail cellblock with respondent Perkins, who was incarcerated on charges unrelated to the murder that Parisi was investigating.
21 kwi 2017 · A case in which the Court held that the rights to silence and to have an attorney present during a custodial interrogation established in Miranda v. Arizona are not violated when, after a suspect invokes his right to silence and questioning ceases, the suspect is read his rights again and a sufficient amount of time passes before a second ...
This Note analyzes Illinois v. Perkins, a 1990 United States Supreme Court case. The Court concluded that the concerns of Miranda v. Arizona were not implicated in Perkins, a case in which an undercover law enforcement officer posed as an inmate to elicit incriminating statements from-a murder suspect
ILLINOIS v. LLOYD PERKINS is a case that was decided by the Supreme Court of the United States on June 4, 1990. The case was argued before the court on February 20, 1990. In an 8-1 ruling, the U.S. Supreme Court reversed the ruling of the lower court and remanded the case for further proceedings consistent with the Court's opinion.
496 u.s. 292, 110 l. ed. 2d 243, 110 s. ct. 2394, 1990 u.s. lexis 2885, scdb 1989-102
Brief Fact Summary. An undercover police agent was placed in jail with the suspect and got them to elicit incriminating statements. Synopsis of Rule of Law. Miranda warnings are not required when an undercover agent asks questions that could result in incriminating statements. Facts.
