Search results
Idealism and relativism are two philosophical perspectives that have been debated for centuries. While both offer unique insights into the nature of reality and knowledge, they also have distinct differences that set them apart.
The discrepancies between idealism and relativism in predicting environmental judgement and self-reported environmental behaviours suggest that moral philosophy could potentially influence the formation of the “attitude-behaviour” gap and calls for further research to explore these issues.
11 wrz 2015 · Relativism, roughly put, is the view that truth and falsity, right and wrong, standards of reasoning, and procedures of justification are products of differing conventions and frameworks of assessment and that their authority is confined to the context giving rise to them.
26 paź 2020 · In this study, we have assessed the impact of idealism and relativism using the Ethics Position Theory. We have tested its capacity to predict moral identity, moral judgement of social vs. environmental issues, and self-reported pro-environmental behaviours.
1 maj 1988 · While idealism refers to an individual's "concern for the welfare of others", relativism is the "extent to which individuals base their personal moral philosophies on universal...
5 maj 2020 · Several debates of the last years within the research field of contemporary realism – known under titles such as "New Realism," "Continental Realism," or "Speculative Materialism" – have shown that science is not systematically the ultimate measure of truth and reality.
Ethics position theory favors two—idealism and relativism—whereas MFT includes (at least) five: harm, fairness, loyalty, authority, and sanctity. However, the harm and fairness foundations in MFQ are often closely associated with one another, as are the ingroup, authority, and sanctity foundations [52].
