Search results
9 sty 2006 · Booker T. Hudson was convicted of drug and firearm possession in state court after police found cocaine and a gun in his home. The police had a search warrant, but failed to follow the Fourth Amendment "knock and announce" rule which requires police officers to wait 20-30 seconds after knocking and announcing their presence before they enter ...
Detroit police executing a search warrant for narcotics and weapons entered petitioner Hudson's home in violation of the Fourth Amendment's "knock-and-announce" rule. The trial court granted Hudson's motion to suppress the evidence seized, but the Michigan Court of Appeals reversed on interlocutory appeal. Hudson was convicted of drug possession.
6 kwi 2017 · Case summary for Hudson v. Michigan: Police arrived at Hudson’s home after obtaining a warrant. Three to five seconds after announcing their presence, police entered Hudson’s home and found drugs and a firearm.
Police obtained a search warrant for drugs and firearms at Booker Hudson's home. Upon executing the warrant, the police announced their presence but waited only three to five seconds before entering the unlocked door. They found large quantities of drugs and a loaded gun.
Hudson v. Michigan, 547 U.S. 586 (2006), is a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that a violation of the Fourth Amendment requirement that police officers knock, announce their presence, and wait a reasonable amount of time before entering a private residence (the knock-and-announce requirement) does not require ...
In Hudson v. Michigan, 547 U.S. 586, 126 S. Ct. 2159, 165 L. Ed. 2d 56 (2006), police violated the knock-and-announce rule by entering a home too quickly (three to five seconds) after announcing their presence when executing a search warrant for drugs and firearms. 547 U.S. at 588.
Get Hudson v. Michigan, 547 U.S. 586 (2006), United States Supreme Court, case facts, key issues, and holdings and reasonings online today. Written and curated by real attorneys at Quimbee.
