Search results
29 lis 2022 · 8–1 decision for United States majority opinion by Brett M. Kavanaugh Texas and Louisiana lack Article III standing to challenge immigration-enforcement guidelines promulgated by the Secretary of Homeland Security that prioritize the arrest and removal of certain noncitizens from the United States.
On July 21, 2022, the court denied the application for stay in a 5–4 vote, but granted certiorari before judgment and set the case for argument in the December sitting. [2] Oral arguments were held on November 29, 2022.
Texas and Louisiana lack Article III standing to challenge immigration-enforcement guidelines promulgated by the Secretary of Homeland Security that prioritize the arrest and removal of certain noncitizens from the United States. Justice Brett Kavanaugh authored the majority opinion of the Court.
United States v. Texas: Supreme Court holds that Texas and Louisiana lack Article III standing to challenge the Guidelines for the Enforcement of Civil Immigration Law.
29 lis 2022 · Holding: Texas and Louisiana lack Article III standing to challenge immigration-enforcement guidelines promulgated by the Secretary of Homeland Security that prioritize the arrest and removal of certain noncitizens from the United States. Judgment: Reversed, 8-1, in an opinion by Justice Kavanaugh on June 23, 2023.
Syllabus. UNITED STATES ET AL. v. TEXAS ET AL. CERTIORARI BEFORE JUDGMENT TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT. No. 22–58. Argued November 29, 2022—Decided June 23, 2023.
TBD. Issue: Whether the Supreme Court should stay a district court’s nationwide vacatur of the September 2021 guidance issued by the Secretary of Homeland Security in which he identified as priorities for apprehension and removal noncitizens who threaten national security, public safety, and border security.
