Yahoo Poland Wyszukiwanie w Internecie

Search results

  1. United States v. Texas,4 a challenge to executive branch immigration nonenforcement. With repeated invocations of the history of executive discretion, the Court held that Texas and Louisiana lacked Article III standing to challenge a U.S. Department of Homeland Security (DHS) decision to pause removals of noncitizens.5 Although the Court invo...

  2. 29 lis 2022 · 8–1 decision for United States majority opinion by Brett M. Kavanaugh. Texas and Louisiana lack Article III standing to challenge immigration-enforcement guidelines promulgated by the Secretary of Homeland Security that prioritize the arrest and removal of certain noncitizens from the United States.

  3. 18 kwi 2016 · Issue: (1) Whether a state that voluntarily provides a subsidy to all aliens with deferred action has Article III standing and a justiciable cause of action under the Administrative Procedure Act (APA) to challenge the Secretary of Homeland Security’s guidance seeking to establish a process for considering deferred action for certain aliens beca...

  4. UNITED STATES, PETITIONER v. TEXAS, ET AL. ON WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT. [December 10, 2021] PER CURIAM. The writ of certiorari is dismissed as improvidently granted. The application to vacate stay presented to JUSTICE ALITO and by him referred to the Court is denied. It is so ordered.

  5. 29 lis 2022 · Holding: Texas and Louisiana lack Article III standing to challenge immigration-enforcement guidelines promulgated by the Secretary of Homeland Security that prioritize the arrest and removal of certain noncitizens from the United States.

  6. Justice Sotomayor would grant the application to vacate stay in No. 21A85 and dissents from the dismissal of No. 21-588 as improvidently granted. The application to vacate stay presented to Justice Alito and by him referred to the Court is denied.

  7. www.democratfacts.org › wp-content › uploadsUNITED STATES v. TEXAS

    UNITED STATES v. TEXAS No. 15-674 SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES December 4, 2015 Reporter 2015 U.S. S. Ct. Briefs LEXIS 4505 * UNITED STATES, ET AL., Petitioners, v. STATE OF TEXAS, ET AL., Respondents. Type: Amicus Brief Prior History: On Petition for a Writ of Certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit. Table ...

  1. Ludzie szukają również