Yahoo Poland Wyszukiwanie w Internecie

Search results

  1. 5 paź 2022 · Eight states and the Governors of two states, led by Texas, have challenged DACA's validity. In ruling on competing motions for summary judgment, the district court held that the DACA Memorandum violates procedural and substantive requirements of the Administrative Procedure Act (APA).

  2. 5 paź 2022 · State of Texas v. USA, No. 21-40680 (5th Cir. 2022) Annotate this Case. Justia Opinion Summary. In 2012 the Secretary of the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) announced the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) program. Eight states and the Governors of two states, led by Texas, have challenged DACA’s validity.

  3. 29 lis 2022 · 8–1 decision for United States majority opinion by Brett M. Kavanaugh. Texas and Louisiana lack Article III standing to challenge immigration-enforcement guidelines promulgated by the Secretary of Homeland Security that prioritize the arrest and removal of certain noncitizens from the United States.

  4. 13 lis 2023 · On January 22, 2021, Texas sued the United States and Acting Secretary Pekoske in the Southern District of Texas. 14 Arguing the new guidelines violated its agreement with DHS, Texas carefully grounded its claim in “budgetary harms, including higher education and healthcare costs.” 15 Based on these alleged costs, the district court ...

  5. 14 gru 2018 · The Individual Plaintiffs, who are citizens and residents of the State of Texas, challenge the Individual Mandate as an unconstitutional requirement to purchase ACA-compliant health insurance. They argue they are injured by the "obligation to comply with the individual mandate ... despite the provision's unconstitutionality."

  6. United States v. Texas, 579 U.S. ___ (2016) Docket No. 15-674. Granted: January 19, 2016. Argued: April 18, 2016. Decided: June 23, 2016. Justia Summary. An equally divided Court affirmed, by per curiam opinion, the judgment of the appeals court below.

  7. Justice Sotomayor would grant the application to vacate stay in No. 21A85 and dissents from the dismissal of No. 21-588 as improvidently granted. The application to vacate stay presented to Justice Alito and by him referred to the Court is denied.

  1. Ludzie szukają również