Search results
5 paź 2022 · Eight states and the Governors of two states, led by Texas, have challenged DACA’s validity. In ruling on competing motions for summary judgment, the district court held that the DACA Memorandum violates procedural and substantive requirements of the Administrative Procedure Act (APA).
15 kwi 2016 · United States v. Texas, the biggest immigration case in a century, explained. Protesters supporting DAPA and DACA in front of the Supreme Court. When it takes up the question of whether...
Texas filed suit in 2018, after several courts ruled that the Trump Administration’s attempt to end DACA was unlawful. It claims that DACA’s creation was procedurally improper and that DACA substantively conflicts with immigration statutes.
Summary. This is an appeal of a district court decision granting the request by Texas and eight other states to permanently enjoin (block) the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) program.
5 paź 2022 · Twenty-six states filed suit in the Southern District of Texas to prevent DAPA's implementation. The district court entered a nationwide preliminary injunction. In Texas v. United States (DAPA), this court affirmed the grant of injunctive relief.
United States v. Texas: Supreme Court holds that Texas and Louisiana lack Article III standing to challenge the Guidelines for the Enforcement of Civil Immigration Law.
In the Supreme Court of the United States. DE. Applicants, v. STATE OF TEXAS. THE STATE OF TEXAS’S RESPONSE IN OPPOSITION TO THE UNITED STATES’S APPLICATION TO VACATE INJUNCTION PENDING APPEAL ISSUED BY THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT. KEN PAXTON Attorney General of Texas. BRENT WEBSTER. First Assistant Attorney General.
