Search results
13 lis 2023 · On January 22, 2021, Texas sued the United States and Acting Secretary Pekoske in the Southern District of Texas. 14 Arguing the new guidelines violated its agreement with DHS, Texas carefully grounded its claim in “budgetary harms, including higher education and healthcare costs.” 15 Based on these alleged costs, the district court ...
14 lip 2023 · In a recent 8-1 ruling in United States v. Texas , the Supreme Court held that Texas and Louisiana lacked standing to challenge the agency’s guidance to line-level personnel on how to direct their enforcement efforts.
5 paź 2022 · DACA was not a general policy statement exempt from notice and comment because it involved "significant rights and obligations" and imposed "fixed criteria." The district court further held that DACA was substantively unlawful because it violated the INA and other immigration statutes.
10 lis 2022 · The Immigration and Nationality Act 13 (INA) states that certain noncitizens “shall be detained” pending removal proceedings. 14 A separate INA provision authorizes DHS to “parole” these noncitizens into the United States, but “only on a case-by-case basis for urgent humanitarian reasons or significant public benefit.” 15 And yet ...
The District Court found that the States would incur costs due to the Executive’s failure to comply with those alleged statutory mandates, and that the States had standing to sue based on those costs. On the merits, the District Court found the Guidelines unlawful and vacated them.
In this Note, I argue that the Supreme Court’s litigation-avoidance doctrine—the doctrine that courts should address qualified immunity at the earliest possible stage of litigation—abridges the right to petition.
15 kwi 2016 · Texas and the 25 other states suing will get 30 minutes. The federal government will get 35. But the Supreme Court has also given 10 minutes to a lawyer representing a group of immigrant women...
