Search results
Held: (1) That the intention of the two governments, as gathered from the words of the treaty, must control, and that the map to which the contracting parties referred is to be given the same effect as if it had been expressly made a part of the treaty.
13 lis 2023 · On January 22, 2021, Texas sued the United States and Acting Secretary Pekoske in the Southern District of Texas. 14 Arguing the new guidelines violated its agreement with DHS, Texas carefully grounded its claim in “budgetary harms, including higher education and healthcare costs.” 15 Based on these alleged costs, the district court ...
10 lis 2022 · Across several areas of administrative law, the Roberts Court has made it harder for agencies to exercise power. Chevron deference has gone missing. 1 The major questions doctrine has been transformed into a powerful presumption against agency authority. 2 And arbitrariness review has become less deferential after DHS v.
The States of Texas and Louisiana claim that the Guide-lines contravene two federal statutes that they read to require the ar-rest of certain noncitizens upon their release from prison (8 U. S. C. §1226(c)) or entry of a final order of removal (§1231(a)(2)).
5 paź 2022 · In Texas v. United States (DAPA), this court affirmed the grant of injunctive relief. We held that DAPA likely violated procedural APA requirements because it was a substantive rule that required notice and comment.
14 lip 2023 · In a recent 8-1 ruling in United States v. Texas , the Supreme Court held that Texas and Louisiana lacked standing to challenge the agency’s guidance to line-level personnel on how to direct their enforcement efforts.
Texas sought administrative relief in the form of a waiver of liability. After the Food Stamp Appeals Board denied the requested relief, Texas sued the United States in the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas.
