Search results
1 dzień temu · Impact of the Ruling. The ruling in State of Texas v. Dep’t of Labor impacts the entire nation because it prevents the Department of Labor’s 2024 rule from going into effect. As a result, the ...
In a highly anticipated ruling, a federal judge for the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas stopped the U.S. Department of Labor (DOL) from raising the minimum salary level for certain exempt employees of the State of Texas.
13 lis 2023 · On January 22, 2021, Texas sued the United States and Acting Secretary Pekoske in the Southern District of Texas. 14 Arguing the new guidelines violated its agreement with DHS, Texas carefully grounded its claim in “budgetary harms, including higher education and healthcare costs.” 15 Based on these alleged costs, the district court ...
ed Appropriations Act, 20. , Pub. L. No. 116-260, 134 Stat. 1182, 2758-890 (2020). The Departmen. s able opinion, we AFFIRM.BACKGROUNDI. Statutory Background: The No Surprises ActThe No Surprises Act is intended to protect patients from “surprise” medical bills by “limit[ing] the amount an insured.
29 lis 2022 · Texas and Louisiana lack Article III standing to challenge immigration-enforcement guidelines promulgated by the Secretary of Homeland Security that prioritize the arrest and removal of certain noncitizens from the United States. Justice Brett Kavanaugh authored the majority opinion of the Court.
Justice Sotomayor would grant the application to vacate stay in No. 21A85 and dissents from the dismissal of No. 21-588 as improvidently granted. The application to vacate stay presented to Justice Alito and by him referred to the Court is denied.
The States of Texas and Louisiana claim that the Guidelines contravene two federal statutes that they read to require the arrest of certain noncitizens upon their release from prison ( 8 U. S. C. §1226 (c)) or entry of a final order of removal (§1231 (a) (2)).
