Search results
29 lis 2022 · Texas and Louisiana lack Article III standing to challenge immigration-enforcement guidelines promulgated by the Secretary of Homeland Security that prioritize the arrest and removal of certain noncitizens from the United States. Justice Brett Kavanaugh authored the majority opinion of the Court.
The States of Texas and Louisiana claim that the Guide-lines contravene two federal statutes that they read to require the ar-rest of certain noncitizens upon their release from prison (8 U. S. C. §1226(c)) or entry of a final order of removal (§1231(a)(2)).
13 lis 2023 · On January 22, 2021, Texas sued the United States and Acting Secretary Pekoske in the Southern District of Texas. 14 Arguing the new guidelines violated its agreement with DHS, Texas carefully grounded its claim in “budgetary harms, including higher education and healthcare costs.” 15 Based on these alleged costs, the district court ...
Texas sought administrative relief in the form of a waiver of liability. After the Food Stamp Appeals Board denied the requested relief, Texas sued the United States in the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas.
22 lut 2023 · Constitutional Law and American History: Cases and Briefs. This research guide provides a starting point for students conducting research in American constitutional law. It will address how to find the United States Constitution and the secondary sources discussing it. Getting Started.
19 mar 2024 · Today, the Court invites further chaos and crisis in immigration enforcement. Texas passed a law that directly regulates the entry and removal of noncitizens and explicitly instructs its state courts to disregard any ongoing federal immigration proceedings.
SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES. Syllabus. TORRES v. TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY. CERTIORARI TO THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TEXAS, THIRTEENTH DISTRICT. No. 20–603. Argued March 29, 2022—Decided June 29, 2022.
