Search results
5 paź 2022 · State of Texas v. USA, No. 21-40680 (5th Cir. 2022) Annotate this Case. Justia Opinion Summary. In 2012 the Secretary of the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) announced the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) program. Eight states and the Governors of two states, led by Texas, have challenged DACA’s validity.
20 lis 2021 · A budget regulates a state’s cash flow. There are three aspect to this flow. The first is the definition of which sources of revenue will be used to gather money into the treasury. The second is determining which of the many funds the revenue will be allocated to. The third is the expenditure itself.
The Texas Comptroller of Public Accounts is an executive branch position created by the Texas Constitution. The comptroller is popularly elected every four years, and is primarily tasked with collecting all state tax revenue and estimating the amount of revenue that the Texas Legislature can spend each biennium.
1 mar 1993 · In United States v. Texas, 507 U.S. 529, 533, 113 S.Ct. 1631, 123 L.Ed.2d 245 (1993), the Supreme Court considered whether the statutory scheme there implicitly allowed for the federal government to recover prejudgment interest for money owed by state governments. Summary of this case from SCA Hygiene Products Aktiebolag SCA Personal Care, Inc ...
Texas and Louisiana lack Article III standing to challenge immigration-enforcement guidelines promulgated by the Secretary of Homeland Security that prioritize the arrest and removal of certain noncitizens from the United States. Justice Brett Kavanaugh authored the majority opinion of the Court.
13 lis 2023 · On January 22, 2021, Texas sued the United States and Acting Secretary Pekoske in the Southern District of Texas. 14 Arguing the new guidelines violated its agreement with DHS, Texas carefully grounded its claim in “budgetary harms, including higher education and healthcare costs.” 15 Based on these alleged costs, the district court ...
Held: (1) That the intention of the two governments, as gathered from the words of the treaty, must control, and that the map to which the contracting parties referred is to be given the same effect as if it had been expressly made a part of the treaty.
