Search results
30 cze 2023 · KEY SUMMARY FOR PRACTITIONERS • United States v. Texas held that Texas and Louisiana lacked standing to challenge the Executive Branch’s enforcement decisions on whether or not to arrest and prosecute individuals suspected of violating immigration laws. • The decision may have broader implications on states’ standing to challenge federal
14 lip 2023 · In a recent 8-1 ruling in United States v. Texas , the Supreme Court held that Texas and Louisiana lacked standing to challenge the agency’s guidance to line-level personnel on how to direct their enforcement efforts.
Syllabus. UNITED STATES ET AL. v. TEXAS ET AL. CERTIORARI BEFORE JUDGMENT TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT. No. 22–58. Argued November 29, 2022—Decided June 23, 2023.
Shortly after taking office in January 2021, the administration directed the U.S. immigration agency, ICE, to stop all deportations except those that posed a threat to "national security, public safety, and border security".
27 paź 2021 · November 6, 2020: Nearly five months after the U.S. Supreme Court rejects the Trump administration’s attempt to end DACA, MALDEF and other interveners file a motion seeking summary judgment and opposing a multi-state request for summary judgment in Texas v. United States.
Summary. This is an appeal of a district court decision granting the request by Texas and eight other states to permanently enjoin (block) the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) program.
United States v. Texas: Supreme Court holds that Texas and Louisiana lack Article III standing to challenge the Guidelines for the Enforcement of Civil Immigration Law.
