Search results
This is an appeal of a district court decision granting the request by Texas and eight other states to permanently enjoin (block) the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) program.
5 paź 2022 · We review the district court’s vacatur decision for abuse of discretion. 228 Two factors determine whether vacatur is warranted: “(1) the seriousness of the deficiencies of the action, that is, how likely the agency will be able to justify its decision on remand; and (2) the disruptive consequences of the vacatur.” 229 Remand without ...
Texas filed suit in 2018, after several courts ruled that the Trump Administration’s attempt to end DACA was unlawful. It claims that DACA’s creation was procedurally improper and that DACA substantively conflicts with immigration statutes.
31 sie 2021 · What does this recent court decision mean if I am: A current DACA recipient: If you currently have DACA and your work authorization has not expired, your DACA is still in effect, and you are eligible to request renewal at the appropriate time.
12 lip 2023 · United States Attorney. JOSHUA M. SALZMAN KEVIN B. SOTER. Attorneys, Appellate Staff Civil Division, Room 7222 U.S. Department of Justice 950 Pennsylvania Avenue NW Washington, DC 20530 (202) 305-1754. SONSA certificate of interested persons is not required, as.
27 paź 2021 · June 29, 2023: MALDEF attorneys request that Judge Hanen consider a recent U.S. Supreme Court decision that held that Texas and other states lacked standing to challenge the Biden Administration’s immigration enforcement priority guidelines.
24 sie 2022 · In a long-anticipated decision, a federal judge in the Southern District of Texas ruled on July 16, 2021 that Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) is unlawful under its current terms.
