Search results
30 cze 2023 · • United States v. Texas held that Texas and Louisiana lacked standing to challenge the Executive Branch’s enforcement decisions on whether or not to arrest and prosecute individuals suspected of violating immigration laws. • The decision may have broader implications on states’ standing to challenge federal
10 lis 2022 · The Northern District of Texas promptly enjoined the rescission as arbitrary after engaging in an aggressive reading of Regents. 8 At first, in Biden v. Texas 9 (Biden I), the Supreme Court blessed this aggressive approach and denied the Administration’s request for a stay. 10 But last Term, in Biden v.
13 lis 2023 · On January 22, 2021, Texas sued the United States and Acting Secretary Pekoske in the Southern District of Texas. 14 Arguing the new guidelines violated its agreement with DHS, Texas carefully grounded its claim in “budgetary harms, including higher education and healthcare costs.” 15 Based on these alleged costs, the district court ...
5 paź 2022 · We review the district court's vacatur decision for abuse of discretion. Two factors determine whether vacatur is warranted: "(1) the seriousness of the deficiencies of the action, that is, how likely the agency will be able to justify its decision on remand; and (2) the disruptive consequences of the vacatur."
2 kwi 2003 · Accordingly, we review the question of law raised by the exception and the award de novo. See, e.g., NTEU, Chapter 24, 50 FLRA 330, 332 (1995). We have expressly held that the Back Pay Act specifies the method for computing interest and that we are bound to apply the Act's method of computation.
1 maj 2024 · Avery Auton discusses the potential changes in judicial deference to Treasury regulations if the Supreme Court overturns the Chevron deference in Loper Bright Enterprises v. Raimondo.
1 cze 2018 · (1) Except for review in the Supreme Court of the United States, the United States courts of appeals shall have original and exclusive jurisdiction over any civil action— (A) for review of any final decision or action of the Secretary, the President, or the Commission under this part;
