Search results
23 cze 2023 · The States of Texas and Louisiana claim that the Guidelines contravene two federal statutes that they read to require the arrest of certain noncitizens upon their release from prison (8 U. S. C. § 1226(c))
13 lis 2023 · On January 22, 2021, Texas sued the United States and Acting Secretary Pekoske in the Southern District of Texas. 14 Arguing the new guidelines violated its agreement with DHS, Texas carefully grounded its claim in “budgetary harms, including higher education and healthcare costs.” 15 Based on these alleged costs, the district court ...
30 paź 2024 · (“HHS”); (2) the Internal Revenue Code, enforced by the Department of the Treasury; and (3) the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (“ERISA”), enforced by the Department of Labor. To be consistent with the arties’ briefs and a related decision by a P panel of this court, we cite to the Public Health Services Act provisions. The ...
6 lip 2022 · Texas and Louisiana filed suit, challenging the legality of the Final Memo on the basis that it is contrary to federal law, arbitrary and capricious, and procedurally invalid.
18 kwi 2016 · Issue: (1) Whether a state that voluntarily provides a subsidy to all aliens with deferred action has Article III standing and a justiciable cause of action under the Administrative Procedure Act (APA) to challenge the Secretary of Homeland Security’s guidance seeking to establish a process for considering deferred action for certain aliens ...
Facts of the Case. Provided by Oyez. In September 2021, the Secretary of Homeland Security issued the Guidelines for the Enforcement of Civil Immigration Law in an effort to allocate limited resources that could not feasibly deport every removable non-citizen presently in the United States.
1 gru 2022 · The Supreme Court’s decision to hear the case comes less than one month after its decision in Biden v. Texas, another high-profile suit between Texas and the federal government over immigration policy. The Court’s holding in this case may give insight into how it will decide United States v. Texas. II. BIDEN v.
