Yahoo Poland Wyszukiwanie w Internecie

Search results

  1. 30 paź 2024 · (“HHS”); (2) the Internal Revenue Code, enforced by the Department of the Treasury; and (3) the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (“ERISA”), enforced by the Department of Labor. To be consistent with the arties’ briefs and a related decision by a P panel of this court, we cite to the Public Health Services Act provisions. The ...

  2. 5 dni temu · The decision is a win for the State of Texas and a coalition of business groups that sued over the rule, arguing that the policy would drastically increase payroll costs for employers, resulting in fewer jobs and fewer shifts for workers. ... The case is Texas v. DOL, E.D. Tex., No. 24-00499, summary judgment granted on 11/15/24.

  3. 3 dni temu · Two plaintiffs sued the U.S. Department of the Treasury: Isaac Winkles and the National Small Business Association (“NSBA”), an advocacy group representing about 65,000 small businesses.

  4. 1 dzień temu · The ruling in State of Texas v. Dep’t of Labor impacts the entire nation because it prevents the Department of Labor’s 2024 rule from going into effect. As a result, the minimum salary ...

  5. 30 cze 2024 · The court concluded that “Texas is likely to succeed on its claim that the 2024 Rule’s changes to the minimum salary level contravene the plain text of the EAP Exemption and that the 2024 Rule therefore impermissibly exceeds the Department’s authority to define and delimit the EAP Exemption.”

  6. The court-imposed injunction applies only to the State of Texas as an employer until the court hears an underlying legal challenge. July 1 deadline is still in play for most. Nearly all U.S. employers must still comply with the July 1 salary threshold set forth in the Department of Labor’s April 23 final rule. Additional impact may be ...

  7. 22 cze 2021 · The National Treasury Employees Union disagreed and filed a negotiability petition with the Federal Labor Relations Authority (FLRA), which found the Union’s proposed telework provision was outside the duty to bargain because it affected management’s rights to assign work and to direct employees.

  1. Ludzie szukają również