Search results
10 lis 2022 · Harvard Law Review Print Leading Cases. Administrative Law Leading Case 136 Harv. L. Rev. 460. Biden v. Texas. Volume 136. Issue 1. November 2022. See full issue. Download. See Footnotes. Across several areas of administrative law, the Roberts Court has made it harder for agencies to exercise power.
18 kwi 2016 · Issue: (1) Whether a state that voluntarily provides a subsidy to all aliens with deferred action has Article III standing and a justiciable cause of action under the Administrative Procedure Act (APA) to challenge the Secretary of Homeland Security’s guidance seeking to establish a process for considering deferred action for certain aliens beca...
13 lis 2023 · On January 22, 2021, Texas sued the United States and Acting Secretary Pekoske in the Southern District of Texas. 14 Arguing the new guidelines violated its agreement with DHS, Texas carefully grounded its claim in “budgetary harms, including higher education and healthcare costs.” 15 Based on these alleged costs, the district court ...
The States of Texas and Louisiana claim that the Guide-lines contravene two federal statutes that they read to require the ar-rest of certain noncitizens upon their release from prison (8 U. S. C. §1226(c)) or entry of a final order of removal (§1231(a)(2)).
1 gru 2022 · This Post explains the immigration landscape leading up to the United States v. Texas decision. It then analyzes the Supreme Court’s decision in Biden v. Texas, the previous immigration case decided in the 2022 term, to understand how the current Court might approach other immigration-related cases. The Post closes with a prediction that the ...
5 paź 2022 · In Texas v. United States (DAPA), this court affirmed the grant of injunctive relief. We held that DAPA likely violated procedural APA requirements because it was a substantive rule that required notice and comment.
Biden v. Texas was a U.S. Supreme Court case decided on June 30, 2022, in which the court upheld the U.S. Department of Homeland Security 's memoranda ending the Migrant Protection Protocols (MPP) program as a lawful final agency action consistent with federal immigration law and the Administrative Procedure Act (APA).
