Search results
Case.net is your access to Missouri state courts case records, including docket entries, parties, judgments, and charges in public court.
- Office of State Courts Administrator
Missouri Office of State Courts Administrator 2112...
- Manage My Case
MMC | Version 0.1.23 - Released 01/26/2023 01:08 PM
- Need Legal Help
The Missouri Bar maintains a Legal Resource phone line at...
- Track This Case Help
Track This Case is provided as a service and is not...
- Court Specific Help
Your Missouri Courts. Court Specific Help. For specific...
- Case Information Pages Help
Case Information Screens. Once a case is found, different...
- General Help
Case.net Public Inquiry. Case.net is the Missouri...
- Search Help
Search by Attorney : Enter the MOBAR # (Missouri Bar No.)...
- Office of State Courts Administrator
25 cze 2019 · TREASURER OF the STATE of Missouri as Custodian of the Second Injury Fund, Respondent. No. SC 97317. Decided: June 25, 2019. In 2014, Douglas Cosby injured his left knee at work.
Optional Information (Including this information will speed up the search) First Name: Middle Name: Case Type: All Civil Criminal Family/Domestic Infraction Probate Traffic/Municipal. Year Case was Filed:e.g. 1999. Case Status: AllPendingDisposed. Location: All.
The Supreme Court affirmed, holding that Klecka failed to establish that his primary injury and sole qualifying preexisting disability entitled him to PTD benefits from the Fund under Mo. Rev. Stat. 287.220.3.
Sterling BENNETT, Appellant, v. TREASURER OF the STATE of Missouri, as Custodian of the Second Injury Fund, Respondent. No. ED 108713 Decided: August 25, 2020 ATTORNEY FOR APPELLANT: Laurence D. Mass, 230 S. Bemiston, Suite 1200, St. Louis, MO 63105, LAURENCE D. MASS, Attorney at Law.
Case opinion for Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District,DIVISION TWO. KRYSL v. TREASURER OF MISSOURI. Read the Court's full decision on FindLaw.
Cosby v. Treasurer of State, 579 S.W.3d 202, 205-06 (Mo. banc 2019) (quotation marks omitted). “When interpreting statutes, this Court must ascertain the intent of the legislature by considering the plain and ordinary meaning of the terms and give effect to that intent if possible.” Id. at 206 (alteration and quotation marks omitted).