Search results
21 lip 2022 · I. BACKGROUND. In TOMRA of North America, Inc v Dep’t of Treasury, 325 Mich App 289, 292; 926 NW2d 259 (2018) (“TOMRA II”), we described the machinery involved: Plaintiff sells and leases the container-recycling machines commonly found in grocery stores and also sells repair parts for those machines.
9 mar 2020 · Court of Claims Orders & Opinions. Summary of COC Orders and Opinions PDF (Updated 1/27/2022) 2020. (Decided 4/28/2020 LPL Fin. Holdings, Inc. v. Eubanks PDF. (Decided 3/27/2020) John P. Blake v. Michigan Department of Treasury PDF. (Decided 3/27/2020) Superior National Bank & Trust Co. v. Michigan Department of Treasury PDF.
The Court of Claims denied relief, and the Michigan Court of Appeals affirmed, ruling that appellant is an "annuitant" under federal law, rather than an "employee" within the meaning of § 111, and that that section therefore has no application to him.
27 sie 2024 · Company v Michigan Department of Treasury (Docket No. 365613), the Michigan Court of Appeals affirmed the Opinion and Order issued by the Court of Claims (Docket No. 21-000242-MT), which had granted Treasury’s motion for summary disposition and denied the Taxpayer’s motion for summary disposition.
The court’s ruling echoes Treasury’s conclusion in Letter Ruling 2015-2. Treasury will continue to follow LR 2015-2 unless otherwise directed by a published decision contrary to Judge Talbot’s decision in Old Orchard.
7 gru 2023 · Why it matters: In 2018, the Michigan Legislature used what’s now referred to as an “adopt-and-amend process” to address two ballot proposals: one on minimum wage and the other on paid sick leave. The outcome of this ruling could have cascading and costly effects on employers across all industries.
TruGreen argues that this Court’s opinion in William Mueller & Sons, Inc v Dep’t of Treasury, 189 Mich App 570, 571; 473 NW2d 783 (1991), compels the same conclusion, asserting that it stands for the proposition “that agricultural production is not required by the statute.”
