Search results
Davis v. Michigan Department of Treasury, 489 U.S. 803 (1989), is a case in the Supreme Court of the United States holding that states may not tax federal pensions if they exempt their own state pensions from taxation. [1] In the 1930s, the federal and state governments began to charge income tax on salaries paid to each other's employees.
The Court of Claims denied relief, and the Michigan Court of Appeals affirmed, ruling that appellant is an "annuitant" under federal law, rather than an "employee" within the meaning of § 111, and that that section therefore has no application to him.
1 sie 2024 · The Michigan Supreme Court ruled yesterday that state lawmakers unconstitutionally usurped a voter initiative that was slated for the 2018 ballot – leading the court to reinstate the 2018 voter-initiated versions of the state’s minimum wage and paid sick leave laws.
9 sie 2024 · The Michigan Supreme Court has ruled that the Wage Act will gradually increase the minimum wage in Michigan each year by starting, in February 2025, to mirror the steps that would have taken place beginning in 2019 if the Wage Act had been implemented as adopted (with adjustments for inflation).
5 sie 2024 · The state treasurer has been instructed to calculate the amount based on inflation. That means the minimum wage will be $10 plus the inflation adjustment. As of Aug. 4, 2024, Michigan’s minimum...
6 sie 2024 · The largest and currently most ambiguous changes from this ruling are regarding paid leave for Michigan employees, making it ripe for abuse and litigation issues. Under the new ruling, the Earned Sick Time Act (ESTA) will be enacted on Feb. 21, 2025, replacing Michigan’s Paid Medical Leave Act (PMLA).
Case Year: 1989. Case Ruling: 8-1, Reversed and Remanded. Opinion Justice: Kennedy. FACTS. Michigan's revenue code provided that retirement benefits paid to individuals by the state or any of its political subdivisions were exempt from state income taxes.
