Search results
26 sty 2024 · On January 18, 2024, in a highly anticipated and unanimous decision, the Supreme Court of California barred striking a claim under the Private Attorneys General Act (PAGA) on trial manageability grounds alone, instead authorizing due process defenses to PAGA claims (Estrada v. Royalty Carpet Mills, Inc.). The decision also commented approvingly ...
23 sty 2024 · On January 18, 2024, the California Supreme Court issued its much-anticipated decision in Estrada v. Royalty Carpet Mills, resolving a dispute among the appellate courts and concluding that...
19 sty 2024 · On January 18, 2024, the California Supreme Court issued its much-anticipated decision in Estrada et al. v. Royalty Carpet Mills Inc., which was poised to resolve a conflict between California Private Attorneys General Act (“PAGA”) lawsuits and a litigation concept called “manageability.”
18 sty 2024 · The California Supreme Court granted Royalty’s petition for review to resolve the split of appellate authority as to whether trial courts have inherent authority to strike a PAGA claim on manageability grounds.
9 sty 2024 · The California Supreme Court issued several important decisions in 2023 about issues such as COVID-19 take-home exposure and arbitrating Private Attorney General Act (PAGA) claims. Employers...
On November 8, 2023, the California Supreme Court heard oral argument in Estrada v. Royalty Carpet Mills, Inc., a case that could have profound implications for the future of Private Attorneys General Act (PAGA) litigation.
8 sie 2024 · The California Supreme Court just held that a plaintiff in one PAGA action does not have the right to intervene or object to a judgment in a similar action even if a settlement or other resolution in that similar case results in their PAGA action being entirely extinguished.
