Search results
9 sty 2024 · The Court of Appeal affirmed summary judgment. Now, in a rare less-than-unanimous vote, the California Supreme Court granted review. This case may affect the standards for hostile work...
I. This Court Has Jurisdiction Under Cox Broadcasting’s Third Category . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2. II. This Case Is Perfectly Ripe for Review, Presenting a Great Vehicle to Resolve Issues of. National Importance . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7. CONCLUSION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12.
In summary, Justice Blackmun's dissent in Faretta v. California critically examines the majority's reliance on the Sixth Amendment, historical evidence, and the implications of granting a constitutional right to self-representation.
summary judgment in employment cases will continue to influence trial courts and litigants. Ultimately, the California Supreme Court may be called on yet again to clarify that summary judgment is not a disfavored remedy in any type of case.
Brief Fact Summary. Plaintiff Moore was a cancer patient at U.C.L.A. Medical Center where his doctor, over a period of several years, removed blood and other bodily fluids from Plaintiff which eventually became a “cell line” and was patented for commercial use, which aggrieved Plaintiff.
A written summary of voluminous documents is likely to be helpful, but there is some uncertainty over whether such a summary constitutes admissible evidence in state court. Federal-State Dichotomy In federal court, the rules expressly authorize the use of summaries. (Fed. R. Evid. 1006.) In California courts, however, the situation is different.
The court’s primary role is to decide matters of statewide importance and to maintain uniformity in the law throughout California by reviewing matters from the six districts of the California Courts of Appeal and the fifty-eight county superior courts (the trial courts).
