Search results
It was sold by the guardian of another minor, and the court supervising that guardianship confirmed the sale "to Fred Oyama" as highest bidder at a publicly advertised sale. A copy of the court's order was recorded.
23 lut 1993 · This action concluded with an agreement between the state of California and WBEC that the company receive a $3 million refund. The Federal Government filed a suit in the Eastern District of California in May of 1988, arguing that the remaining state taxes totaling $11 million were also illegitimate.
Dec 7 - 8, 1964. Decided. May 17, 1965. Facts of the case. In United States v. California (1947), the Court ruled that the federal government owned rights to the undersea land off the California coast, an area with rich oil and mineral deposits.
The case of Oyama v. California developed from the 1913 and 1920 Alien Land Laws passed in California. In accordance with those laws, persons ineligible to become citizens of the United States were prohibited from owning land.
The Court found that "due process of law" meant that all citizens be tried "by the law of the land," a concept established by the Magna Carta. When issuing the warrant, the Treasury Department properly applied the 1820 Act, which was part of the "law of the land."
In a 5-4 decision, the Court reversed the Supreme Court of California and found the fines for contempt unconstitutional. Justice Hugo L. Black, writing for the majority, relied on the "clear and present danger" standard set forth in Schenk v. United States.
I certify (or declare) under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing is true and correct. PRINT NAME SIGNATURE DATE DL, ID OR DEALER # PRINT NAME SIGNATURE DATE DL, ID OR DEALER # ... BILL OF SALE A Public Service Agency I/We _____ sell, transfer, and deliver the above vehicle/vessel to _____ on for the ...
