Search results
Fixed-cost fallacy consideration of costs that do not vary with the consequences of your decision (also known as sunk-cost fallacy). In other words, you consider irrelevant costs.
When a firm ignores the opportunity cost of capital when making investment or shutdown decisions, this is a case of a. fixed-cost fallacy. b. sunk-cost fallacy.
The fixed-cost fallacy occurs when: a. a firm considers irrelevant costs. b. a firm ignores relevant costs. c. a firm considers overhead or depreciation costs to make short-run decisions. d. both a and c.
Economic theory teaches that in the case of a short-term decision, only the variable costs of car use are decisive; fixed (e.g. depreciation) or quasi-fixed cost components (for example, costs for inspection) do not play a relevant role. In this case, the relevant costs would be between
The fixed-cost fallacy occurs when a. a firm considers irrelevant costs. b. a firm ignores relevant costs. c. a firm considers overhead or depreciation costs to make short-run decisions. d. Both a and $c$
A "fixed" cost would be monthly payments made as part of a service contract or licensing deal with the company that set up the software. ... [17] [18] This is the sunk cost fallacy, and such behavior may be described as ... [40] have categorised framing effects in a social and economic orientation into three broad classes of theories. Firstly ...
• The fixed-cost fallacy or sunk-cost fallacy means that you consider irrelevant costs. A common fixed-cost fallacy is to let overhead or depreciation costs influence short-run decisions. • The hidden-cost fallacy occurs when you ignore relevant costs.
