Search results
11 mar 2023 · Why were Birmingham hip resurfacing systems recalled? In 2015, manufacturer Smith & Nephew voluntarily recalled femoral heads that were 46 millimeters (mm) in diameter and smaller due to a greater risk of dislocation and a need for revision surgery.
3 cze 2015 · for Recall: The firm observed that the BIRMINGHAM HIP(TM) Resurfacing (BHR) System had revision rates which were higher than established benchmarks. FDA Determined Cause 2: Device Design:...
25 lis 2018 · Scandals involving breast implants and all-metal hips prosthetics have raised global concerns and prompted regulatory reform in the European Union.
Introduced in 1997, the BIRMINGHAM HIP Resurfacing System was designed using knowledge gained from first-generation metal-on-metal total hips and a thorough understanding of hip resurfacing principles.
1 paź 2024 · Smith & Nephew hip implants named in lawsuits have been the subject of hip replacement recalls or reports of serious complications such as loosening, fractures or the need for revision surgery. At least five models have been the subject of individual lawsuits since 2013.
10 sty 2024 · Smith & Nephew BHR. The multinational medical device maker Smith & Nephew, headquartered in Great Britain, has been the subject of many different lawsuits over various allegedly defective hip replacement products, including: Birmingham Hip Resurfacing (BHR) System; Birmingham Hip Modular Head (BHMH) - phased out in 2014-2015
1 wrz 1999 · However in June 2015, the BHR manufacturer (Smith & Nephew) issued an urgent field safety notice, with the Australian Government’s device regulatory authority issuing a recall action notification indicating that the use of the BHR was contraindicated in females and recalling femoral and acetabular head components with femoral head sizes < 50 mm .
