Search results
13 mar 2017 · Terry v. Ohio was the landmark case that provided the name for the “Terry stop.” It established the constitutionality of a limited search for weapons when an officer has reasonable suspicion to believe a crime is afoot based on the circumstances.
Brief Fact Summary. The Petitioner, John W. Terry (the “Petitioner”), was stopped and searched by an officer after the officer observed the Petitioner seemingly casing a store for a potential robbery. The officer approached the Petitioner for questioning and decided to search him first.
The following case brief for Terry v. Ohio (1968) provides a concise and structured summary of the court case that serves as a valuable reference tool for law students and legal professionals. It allows them to review and analyze legal principles, identify key issues and holdings, and gain insight into the court’s reasoning.
21 lut 2024 · Quick Summary. Terry (defendant) and Chilton were observed by a police officer and suspected of planning a robbery. Upon confrontation and a pat-down search by the officer, weapons were found on both men, leading to charges against them. The legal dispute centered on whether the search violated the Fourth Amendment.
We break down the summary, brief, key players, facts and outcomes for you on TestMax. Terry v. Ohio Summary. The Supreme Court ruled in favor of the state of Ohio and the Cleveland police, who conducted a “stop-and-frisk” of a suspect named Terry.
Terry v. Ohio Case Brief Summary: In this case, a policeman's "stop and frisk" action, based on suspicion that a man was armed and involved in criminal activity, led to a critical debate on Fourth Amendment rights.
The Petitioner, John W. Terry (the “Petitioner”), was stopped and searched by an officer after the officer observed the Petitioner seemingly casing a store for a potential robbery. The officer approached the Petitioner for questioning and decided to search him first. Synopsis of Rule of Law.
