Search results
On the facts, it was held that extradition to the United States to face trial in Virginia would expose the fugitive to the risk of treatment going beyond the threshold set by article 3. The special factors taken into account were the youth of the fugitive (he was 18 at the time of the murders), an impaired mental capacity, and the suffering on ...
S v Makwanyane and Another (CCT 3/94) was a landmark 1995 judgment of the Constitutional Court of South Africa. It established that capital punishment was inconsistent with the commitment to human rights expressed in the Interim Constitution.
6 cze 1995 · Zuma v Secretary of Judicial Commission of Inquiry into Allegations of State Capture, Corruption and Fraud in Public Sector Including Organs of State and Others [2021] ZACC 28 (17 September 2021) South African Transport and Allied Workers Union and Another v Garvas and Others [2012] ZACC 13 (13 June 2012)
Facts. T. Makwanyane and M. Mchunu (defendants) were convicted of four counts of murder and various other charges in South Africa (plaintiff). Both defendants were sentenced to death on the murder counts and to imprisonment for the other charges.
6 cze 1995 · 1954 Convention relating to the Status of Stateless Persons. 1961 Convention on the Reduction of Statelessness. 1967 Protocol relating to the Status of Refugees. 1969 OAU Refugee Convention. 1984 Cartagena Declaration. 1998 Guiding Principles on Internal Displacement. 2009 AU Kampala Convention on Internal Displacement.
S v Makwanyane and Another (CCT 3/94) was a landmark 1995 judgment of the Constitutional Court of South Africa. It established that capital punishment was inconsistent with the commitment to human rights expressed in the Interim Constitution.
21 sty 2020 · In Makwanyane delivered on 6 June 1995, the Constitutional Court, in its first politically important and publicly controversial holding, struck down the death penalty.
