Search results
Texas Law Review Online Volume 97 Article The Development and Evolution of The Greenbook: The First Fifty Years Jane O’Connell* Since its founding over 50 years ago, Texas Rules of Form, more commonly known as The Greenbook,1 has gone through 14 editions and expanded from a diminutive 17 pages to its current 132 pages.2 Today’s
8 sie 2021 · Governed by TRCP 166a, there are two types, the Traditional Summary Judgment and the No Evidence Summary Judgment. Tex. R. Civ. P. 166a. According to the Texas Supreme Court, a summary judgment is appropriate if reasonable people agree with the conclusion based on the evidence of the case.
Summary Judgment Evidence— Objections. In 2017, the Texas Supreme Court held (seemingly unequivocally) that a written order sustaining objections to the form of summary judgment proof is essential to preclude the appellate court from consider-ing that proof on appeal. In Seim v.
In Spring 2018, a committee of staff editors constructed the Texas Rules of Form (TRoF) survey with the advice of practitioners, professors, and legal writing instructors. The principal aim of the survey was to learn how the TRoF’s citation conventions were used by Texas attorneys and could better meet the needs of its users.
At the outset, the Brumleys contend that the court of appeals reversed the case on unassigned error because the McDuffs raised no argument in the court of appeals that the Brumleys’ pleadings failed to support the judgment.
Before Texas adopted a rule authorizing summary judgment, we explained in a case addressing unsound-mind tolling that “[t]he law presumes every party to a legal contract to have had sufficient mental capacity to understand his legal rights.”
Code §§ 432.001-432.195, governs the admissibility of evidence in hearings held under that Code. (h) Definitions. In these rules: (1) “civil case” means a civil action or proceeding; (2) “criminal case” means a criminal action or proceeding, including an examining trial; (3) “public office” includes a public agency;
