Search results
One of the grounds of Poland's appeal (February 20th, 1925) against this decision was that the High Commissioner had failed to give a definition of the port, as requested by Poland. Danzig, in her reply to the Polish appeal, under date of March 2nd, 1925, contested Poland's claim in regard to the definition of the port from the point of view of ...
7–2 decision for New Yorkmajority opinion by Edward T. Sanford. In an opinion authored by Justice Edward Sanford, the Court concluded that New York could prohibit advocating violent efforts to overthrow the government under the Criminal Anarchy Law.
Gitlow v. New York, 268 U.S. 652 (1925), was a landmark decision of the United States Supreme Court holding that the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution had extended the First Amendment's provisions protecting freedom of speech and freedom of the press to apply to the governments of U.S. states.
Brief Fact Summary. Defendant Benjamin Gitlow, a member of the left wing, wrote and published two papers that promoted the violent overthrow of the government. He was indicted on two counts of anarchy and advocacy of criminal anarchy.
Gitlow v. New York, legal case in which the U.S. Supreme Court ruled on June 8, 1925, that the First Amendment protection of free speech also applies to state governments. Learn more about the case, the issues it raised, and the Court’s ruling in this article.
Gitlow v. New York involves Benjamin Gitlow, who was convicted under New York's Criminal Anarchy Law for distributing a manifesto advocating the overthrow of the government by force. The case questioned whether the New York statute violated the Fourteenth Amendment's due process clause.
In Gitlow v. New York, 268 U.S. 652, decided in 1925, the Court assumed that the right of free speech was among the freedoms protected against state infringement by the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. Summary of this case from Ginsberg v. New York
