Search results
11 paź 2023 · Retention indices (RI) in gas chromatography are briefly reviewed. •. Various incorrect usages of RI as reported in the literature are summarised. •. Care with quoting enantioseparation RI data are recommended. •. An overview of methods to estimate RI in multi- and comprehensive 2D GC are included. Abstract.
30 sie 2023 · These newer models effectively outperformed all prior RI predictors with very low mean absolute errors (MAEs – 23 RI units) and very low mean absolute percentage error (MAPE – 1.32%) [12]. Unfortunately, many highly accurate RI predictors are closed source and/or only available commercially.
15 lip 2020 · Six ways of retention index (RI) usage in GC-MS library search are compared. •. Computation of a score as a sum of weighted RI deviation and spectral similarity shows good performance. •. This measure is also recommended when RI predicted using neural networks are used as reference. •.
Appendix G 173 X ERF X ERF X ERF X ERF 3.61 .999999669749 4.06 .999999990627 4.51 .999999999821 4.96 .999999999998 3.62 .999999693577 4.07 .999999991379 4.52 .999999999837 4.97 .999999999998
8.0 Reagecon’s Refractive Index and Brix Standards. Reagecon’s standards fall into 4 different classifications (see Table’s 4, 5, 6 and 7). To start with, we have Brix Standards which are comprised of ICUMSA compliant and ICUMSA non-compliant standards.
RI detectors work by measuring changes in the bulk properties of the solvent and the solutes under investigation, exploiting the improbability that solvents Refractive index
One measurement of the likely difference is given by the standard error (SE), which indicates the extent to which an estimate might have varied by chance because only a sample of dwellings was included.
