Search results
Exploitative Revenues, Law Enforcement, and the Quality of Government Service. Quality of Government Service∗. Rebecca Goldstein. Michael W. Sances. Hye Young You. Abstract. municipalities by imposing and collecting fees, fines, and asset forfeitures. We examine whether revenue collection activitie.
10 kwi 2015 · Using law enforcement to raise revenue is part of a larger trend of thinking about government through the logic of business. 76 In the criminal context, critiques of privatization has primarily focused on how these developments transfer state authority to private actors. 77 But the examples in section A share another important feature ...
We discuss the mechanisms behind criminal justice revenue generation, the consequences to law enforcement outcomes, and policies designed to reform and mitigate revenue-driven law enforcement.
5 mar 2024 · Using data from the 2016 & 2020 waves of the Law Enforcement Management & Administration Survey (LEMAS), we examine how organizational constructs influence whether and how frequently agencies collect asset forfeiture revenue.
Abstract. A growing body of evidence indicates that local police departments are being used to provide revenue for municipalities by imposing and collecting fees, fines, and asset forfeitures. We examine whether revenue collection activities compromise the criminal investigation functions of local police departments.
7 cze 2019 · The fact that law enforcement agencies can often spend forfeiture proceeds—and, indeed, in the case of equitable sharing proceeds, must use them as a budget supplement—has led to charges that agencies undertake forfeiture more to realize revenue than to disrupt or deter crime.
Law enforcement institutions are entrusted with a diverse set of tasks requiring a high degree of integrity within police agencies and their oversight. Where this does not func-tion well, law enforcement officers may become vulnerable to acting unlawfully and outside their remit.
