Search results
In this text, Descartes wrestles with this question: how can we know our beliefs are justified? How can we root out our biases? This is the theme of Descartes’ Meditations on First Philosophy. We are reading selections from the first two of these Meditations today. If you want to download a PDF of
Meditations René Descartes Second Meditation from these former beliefs just as carefully as I withhold it from obvious falsehoods. It isn’t enough merely to have noticed this, though; I must make an effort to remember it. My old familiar opinions keep coming back, and against my will they capture my belief.
, Descartes says to his readers in the Preface (p. 9, below), and he makes it clear that he means the Meditations not to be a treatise, a mere exposition of philosophical reasons and conclusions, but rather an exercise in thinking, presented as an encouragement and a guide to readers who will think philosophic-ally themselves.
RENE DESCARTES MEDITATIONS ON FIRST PHILOSOPHY who have it not are culpable in their ignorance. This indeed appears from the Wisdom of Solomon, chapter xiii., where it is said “How be it they are not to be excused; for if their understanding was so great that they could discern the world and the creatures, why did they not rather
by René Descartes (1641) translated by John Cottingham (1984) FIRST MEDITATION. What can be called into doubt. Some years ago I was struck by the large number of falsehoods that I had accepted as true in my childhood, and by the highly doubtful nature of the whole edifice that I had subsequently based on them.
The Latin phrase cogito ergo sum ("I think, therefore I am") is possibly the single best-known philosophical statement and is attributed to René Descartes. Cogito ergo sum is a translation of Descartes' original French statement, Je pense, donc, je suis. The argument that is usually summarized as "cogito ergo sum" appears first in Descartes' ...
3 lip 2017 · With his method of doubt, he rejected all previous beliefs, allowing only those that survived rigorous scrutiny. In this essay, Leslie Allan examines whether Descartes’s program of skeptical enquiry was successful in laying a firm foundation for our manifold beliefs.
