Search results
2 mar 2010 · Several suits were filed against Chicago and Oak Park in Illinois challenging their gun bans after the Supreme Court issued its opinion in District of Columbia v. Heller. In that case, the Supreme Court held that a District of Columbia handgun ban violated the Second Amendment.
McDonald v. Chicago: The Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment extends the Second Amendment’s right to keep and bear arms to the states, at least for traditional, lawful purposes such as self-defense.
May 16, 1949. Facts of the case. Father Arthur Terminiello, in an auditorium in Chicago, delivered a vitriolic speech in which he criticized various political and racial groups and viciously condemned the protesting crowd that had gathered outside the auditorium.
2 mar 2010 · Petitioners Otis McDonald, Adam Orlov, Colleen Lawson, and David Lawson brought suit against Chicago and Oak Park, arguing that the laws seeking to prohibit the possession of handguns left residents vulnerable and unable to protect themselves against intruders or criminals.
On June 10, 2010, the Supreme Court of the United States reverses the judgment of the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit and remands McDonald et al. v. Chicago et al. back for further proceedings.
Facts of the Case. Provided by Oyez. Several suits were filed against Chicago and Oak Park in Illinois challenging their gun bans after the Supreme Court issued its opinion in District of Columbia v. Heller. In that case, the Supreme Court held that a District of Columbia handgun ban violated the Second Amendment.
A multimedia judicial archive of the Supreme Court of the United States.
