Search results
Zoumpoulakis focuses on the concept of minimum rules as a feature of EU criminal procedural law and argues that the balance between the goals of police and judicial co-operation versus the discretion of Member States must be redefined. Ariadna Ochnio argues in favour of a new definition of the concept of “judicial authority” within Europe-
These examples show that differences in the laws of the EU Member States need not be procedural in nature, but can also be those of substantive criminal law, as a consequence of which a refusal ground is triggered. Regarding procedural rights, the FCC had subsequently
In the field of procedural criminal law, the adoption of minimum rules sup-ports the need to facilitate mutual recognition and police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters. This Article seeks to introduce the reader to the world of minimum rules.
Procedural law, the law governing the machinery of the courts and the methods by which both the state and the individual (the latter including groups, whether incorporated or not) enforce their rights in the several courts. Procedural law prescribes the means of enforcing rights or providing.
This volume reviews the procedural law and practices of the international criminal tribunals from inves-tigation to trial, appeal, and punishment, and examines the framework within which the substantive law operates.
It includes most of the papers presented at the event, focusing on two main themes: the systemic requirements for a European law of criminal procedure and the different instruments and rules contributing to the emergence of this new field of European law.
This article comprises an overview of the use of procedural justice in three key areas of the criminal justice system: policing, courts, and corrections. The article begins with a summary of the theoretical underpinnings and definitions of procedural justice.
