Search results
1 wrz 2009 · After exhausting his procedural rights under the hospital's bylaws, he sued the hospital and several physicians involved in the peer review process, alleging defamation and other claims. The jury awarded Dr. Poliner $366 million in damages.
Poliner v. from participation in the medical peer review process. The federal Health Care Qual. ty Improvement Act of 1986, as elucidated in Poliner v. Texas Health Systems, encourages effective peer review by conferring immunity on peer.
1 kwi 2012 · Poliner v. Texas Health Systems demonstrates the federal protections afforded peer reviewers and respondent physicians. The specific elements of the peer review disciplinary process vary among institutions and organizations.
Many in the medical and legal communities were astounded after learning the jury in Poliner v. Texas Health Systems1 awarded a cardiologist over $366 million dollars in damages arising from the abeyance/summary suspension of his cardiac catheterization lab (“cardiac cath lab”)
liner v. Texas Health Systems, 537 F.3d 368 (5th Cir. 2008) confirmed that immunity. In August 2004, Lawrence Poliner, M.D., a board-certified physician in internal medicine and cardio-vascular diseases, had certain hos-pital privileges suspended because of concerns over his care of sev-eral patients, including perform-
8 sie 2007 · The brief argues that the federal Health Care Quality Improvement Act should control and that the hospital and its peer reviewers were entitled to immunity under the Act and protection from the physicians lawsuit
29 paź 2015 · From a public health perspective, an effective clinical system has five essential characteristics: consistency, patient-centeredness, team-based care, registry-based information systems, and...
