Search results
Judgment of the Court of First Instance (Fifth Chamber, extended composition) of 26 October 2000. # Bayer AG v Commission of the European Communities.
Summary of the Judgment 1. Competition — Agreements, decisions and concerted practices — Agreements between undertakings — Meaning — Bilateral or multilateral conduct — Included — Uni lateral conduct — Not included — Conduct appearing unilateral — Need to prove acquiescence by other undertakings in that conduct
BAI and Commission v Bayer Notes on Academic Writings Koenigs, Folkmar: Vorliegen einer gegen den EG-Vertrag verstoßenden Vereinbarung über ein wettbewerbsbeschränkendes Verhalten?, Der Betrieb 2004 p.249 (DE)
The Commission held that a tacit agreement existed between Bayer and the wholesalers not to export to the UK contrary to Article 81(1): in its view the agreement was evidenced by the wholesalers ceasing to supply the UK in response to Bayer's tactic of reducing supplies.
BAYER V COMMISSION. JUDGMENT OF THE COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE (Fifth Chamber, Extended Composition) 26 October 2000 * In Case T-41/96, Bayer AG, established in Leverkusen (Germany), represented by J. Sedemund, Rechtsanwalt, Cologne, with an address for service in Luxembourg at the Chambers of A. May, 398 Route d'Esch, applicant, supported by ...
4 sty 2024 · Bayer AG v Commission [1996] Case T-41/96 R. Bayer made and marketed medical drug intended to treat heart disease. As result of differences between national health authorities of MS, prices of these drugs were different across EU, lower in France and Spain.
Commission of the European Communities. v. Bayer AG. « (Appeals – Competition – Parallel imports – Article 85 (1) of the EC Treaty (now Article 81 (1) EC) – Meaning of agreement between undertakings – Proof of the existence of an agreement – Market in pharmaceutical products)».
