Search results
This video contains an animated explanation about the Bayer Corporation vs Union of India Case law.
Bayer Co. v. United Drug Co. Case Brief Summary | Law Case Explained. Get more case briefs explained with Quimbee. Quimbee has over 16,300 case briefs (and counting) keyed to 223...
28 mar 2019 · Case Summary. On 03/28/2019 MATTIE HOWARD-BEY filed a Personal Injury - Other Product Liability lawsuit against BAYER CORPORATION, AN INDIANA CORPORATION. This case was filed in San Francisco County Superior Courts, San Francisco County Civic Center Courthouse located in San Francisco, California.
Bayer AG v Commission of the European Communities. Competition - Parallel imports - Article 85 (1) of the EC Treaty (now Article 81 (1) EC) - Meaning of "agreement between undertakings" - Proof of the existence of an agreement - Market in pharmaceutical products. Case T-41/96.
5 cze 2019 · Cipla contends that Bayer’s claim for patent linkage, based on an interpretation of Section 2 of the Drugs Act is misleading, because the grant of drug regulatory approval by the DCGI cannot, by itself amount to a patent infringement.
18 wrz 2022 · Introduction. The Intellectual Property Appellate Board upheld the Controller of Patents’ decision to give India’s first compulsory licence and clarified the circumstances under which such licences are permissible. Facts related to the case Bayer Corporation v Union of India and Others.
4 sty 2024 · Held. Facts. Bayer made and marketed medical drug intended to treat heart disease. As result of differences between national health authorities of MS, prices of these drugs were different across EU, lower in France and Spain. So Spain and France exported great amounts of drugs to the UK.
