Search results
23 lip 2014 · With no subscription, glancing at the full text of any 1 article costs anywhere from $20 to $60. For any one project or paper I'd use at least five to ten papers and I'd skim over the full text of many more. For a meta-analysis of the literature, I'd go over dozens and perhaps even over a hundred papers.
1 sie 2024 · Although voluntary peer review has long been the norm, there are strong arguments in favour of payment for peer review. Researchers who serve as peer reviewers give up important time from their research, teaching duties, and other administrative duties to assess scientific manuscripts.
22 wrz 2022 · In this two-tiered system, scholars with access to more funding receive premium treatment, while low-income authors can still access standard peer review similar to what authors currently receive for free.
23 kwi 2022 · Paying for reviews could increase the pool of reviewers, particularly reaching researchers who cannot afford to work for free. Payment could also increase the motivation to review, encourage increased speed and reviews of improved quality, and might even tap into the pool of retired researchers.
16 cze 2021 · Lots of things are wrong with paying for peer review, according to Tim Vines and Alison Mudditt in the recent R2R conference debate
28 lut 2021 · The peer review process is essential for evaluating the quality of scholarly works, suggesting corrections, and learning from other authors’ mistakes. The principles of peer review are largely based on professionalism, eloquence, and collegiate attitude.
1 sie 2019 · This article offers succinct guidance about peer review: not only “what to do” (the Good) but also “what not to do” (the Bad) and “what to never do” (the Ugly). It outlines models of peer review and provides an overview of types of reviewer bias, including conflict of interest.
