Search results
The 18-200 VR I or II (same thing, really, the II just gives you a lock at 18mm to keep the lens from extending) - are great lenses as long as you: Don't expect it to shoot fast action in low light. Don't expect it to blow out backgrounds (bokeh) Do get it if you want.
I’m constantly trying to find information on comparing these two lenses and am struggling to understand the differences between these two lenses. Is there any realistic need to keep both of them? Share
Nikon 18-200mm AF-S VR DX lens Review. 9 comments. Best. Add a Comment. spinspin • 16 yr. ago. Decent lens. Good travel lens, when weight and size are factors. Not even close to the pro-class glass Nikon offers, though. 2. Reply. indorock • 16 yr. ago • Edited 16 yr. ago.
9 paź 2009 · The new 18-200 has a tab to look the zoom at 18mm, and the VR lettering is gold, not red. Those are the only differences. Despite popular misconception, both lenses have the same VR system (VR II).
25 maj 2022 · Built for DX format DSLRs, the 18-200mm is more refined than the AF-S DX 18-300mm f/3.5-6.3G ED VR and more manageable than the oversized AF-S DX 18-300mm f/3.5-5.6 VR, while still giving a highly useful ‘effective’ zoom range of 27-300mm in full-frame terms.
26 lut 2008 · Headline features. 27-300mm equivalent focal length range; F3.5-5.6 maximum aperture. VR II optical Vibration Reduction – 4 stops. Compact Silent Wave focusing with M/A for rapid switching between auto and manual focus. F mount for Nikon DX dSLRS only. Angle of view. The pictures below illustrate the focal length range from wide to telephoto.
15 lis 2011 · Verdict. Nikkor DX 18-200mm VR II design, build quality and focusing. The Nikkor DX 18-200mm VR II is pictured below on the far right, with the DX 18-105mm VR kit lens in the middle and the DX 16-85mm VR on the left.
