Search results
9 lis 2010 · Witam, jak w temacie, mam możliwość zamiany mojego 18-105 na 16-85 z niewielką dopłatą. Tego 2 nie używałem i nie wiem jak się sprawuje jako zoom spacerowy. Kwestia bagnetu (metal/plastik) jest dla mnie pomijalna. Mam 70-300VR także zakres też jest czym uzupełnić. Co poradzicie?
3 sty 2012 · I've been contemplating both these lenses recently. For what it's worth, DXOMark puts the 18-105 sharper than the 16-85 at wider focal lengths, while they have the 16-85 sharper at longer focal lengths. Which is a little ironic, if you think about it.
17 lis 2012 · The real actual visable difference is that the 16-85 is wider and that last 2 mm is significant for some people (me for instance), just as the extra reach is of the 18-105 is for others. This summarizes one of the claims why 18-105mm wins in Cost-to-Image-Quality ratio over the 16-85mm, and why the 16-85mm wins with its wider end over the 18 ...
29 gru 2008 · I had a chance to compare 18-105 with 16-85 and found that 16-85 was MUCH superior to 18-105 in all aspects: sharpness, contrast and colors. 18-200 is also better 18-105 as I recall. 16-85 is the best consumer lens for now, I believe.
Simply stated, my 18-105 is exceptionally sharp at all focal lengths and apertures; even more than my 16-85. The 16-85 is built better, has a metal mounting ring, and is slightly faster focussing. I realize that these lenses have some sample to sample variation but my questions are as follows;
Nikon 16 85 vs 18 105 - sharpness, usability, build quality, price, landscape, portrait, stabilizer, Nikon Dx lens review, strengths, weeknesses
17 paź 2008 · I have neither the 16-85 or the 18-105 but researched them extensively as I am deciding which one to get. After many months of looking at every possible review (See slrgear.com) and multiple forum threads, here are my conclusions: 1) Best bang for the buck is definitely the 18-105. The MSRP is $399 but most sell it for $369 or better.
