Search results
2 paź 2011 · The 18-105 lens is very good, and certainly it is the better value. The 16-85 will offer advantages, but they come at a price. If those matter to you you will not be disappointed with the results.
29 gru 2008 · I had a chance to compare 18-105 with 16-85 and found that 16-85 was MUCH superior to 18-105 in all aspects: sharpness, contrast and colors. 18-200 is also better 18-105 as I recall. 16-85 is the best consumer lens for now, I believe.
15 sty 2021 · 14-01-2021, 20:47 #2. Gość. Hej, warto kupić 18-105 ale tu patrz na stan bo nie jest to super solidna konstrukcja, 18-140 jest solidniejszy i fajny zakres, 18-200 odpuść, 16-85 wydawał mi się słabiutki, wielu myli go z drogim 16-80 2.8-4.
3 sty 2012 · I've been contemplating both these lenses recently. For what it's worth, DXOMark puts the 18-105 sharper than the 16-85 at wider focal lengths, while they have the 16-85 sharper at longer focal lengths. Which is a little ironic, if you think about it.
Simply stated, my 18-105 is exceptionally sharp at all focal lengths and apertures; even more than my 16-85. The 16-85 is built better, has a metal mounting ring, and is slightly faster focussing. I realize that these lenses have some sample to sample variation but my questions are as follows; 1.
I think it more or less comes down to versatility and build quality, which the 16-85mm lens wins in. Even though the 16-85mm has a shorter max focal length, it makes up for that with a wider wide-angle, which in my opinion makes a much larger difference than having a bit extra for telephoto.
13 gru 2009 · Here's my highly unscientific test of the kit 18-105 versus 16-85. I actually tested two copies of the 16-85, one grey market the other USA warranty - couldn't tell any differences between the two. As for the differences between the 18-105 and the 16-85, they were quite noticable.
