Search results
4 cze 2010 · Na Twoim miejscu 70-300 uzupełniłbym 16-85, darując sobie 18-105. Chodzi właśnie o ten szeroki kąt, te dwa milimetry od dołu wbrew pozorom robi różnicę. A górny zakres i tak Ci pokrywa trzysetka.
17 lis 2012 · Yes, the 16-85 is a bit sharper but the 18-105 VR is a very good lens. If you're on a budget, get the 18-105 VR, you can't go wrong.
3 sty 2012 · I have both lenses. Set the 18-105 to 85 mm and compared them both. To me the 16-85 looked sharper ( bad copy of the 18-105?) and colours were better. The 16-85 balances better on the D5100. Bought the lens sh. Never regretted it.
Simply stated, my 18-105 is exceptionally sharp at all focal lengths and apertures; even more than my 16-85. The 16-85 is built better, has a metal mounting ring, and is slightly faster focussing. I realize that these lenses have some sample to sample variation but my questions are as follows;
According to my perception, the 16 85 is better at the wide end, the 18 105 is better at the long end. If you have no idea which end would you use more, most people use wide end much more like makes landscapes, family shots. The long end is used for portraits (head and shoulders, or from a distance), or telephoto.
17 lis 2012 · For me, the 16-85 is more attractive than the 18-105 because I frequently shoot buildings and the 16 is wider, but it also has less barrel distortion. By the time you take the distortion out of the 18, it's really more like 20, and there is a huge difference between 16 and 20.
29 gru 2008 · I had a chance to compare 18-105 with 16-85 and found that 16-85 was MUCH superior to 18-105 in all aspects: sharpness, contrast and colors. 18-200 is also better 18-105 as I recall. 16-85 is the best consumer lens for now, I believe.
