Search results
3 lis 2010 · There are two not equals operator - != and <>. What's the difference between them? I heard that != is more efficient than other for comparing strings. Could anyone give a qualitative comment on this statement.
The syntax of the Oracle IN operator that determines whether an expression matches a list of values is as follows: expression [NOT] IN (v1,v2,...) Code language: SQL (Structured Query Language) (sql) and syntax of an expression matches a subquery: expression [NOT] IN (subquery) Code language: SQL (Structured Query Language) (sql) Arguments. In ...
You want to check if two values are not equal in SQL. Example: A social platform’s database has a table named employees with data in the columns first_name, last_name, and hire_date.
Aggregate queries involving NOT LIKE comparisons with columns containing NULL may yield unexpected results. For example, consider the following table and data: CREATE TABLE foo (bar VARCHAR(10)); INSERT INTO foo VALUES (NULL), (NULL);
For example, do not write an IN() expression like this: SELECT val1 FROM tbl1 WHERE val1 IN (1,2,'a'); Instead, write it like this: SELECT val1 FROM tbl1 WHERE val1 IN ('1','2','a'); Implicit type conversion may produce nonintuitive results: mysql> SELECT 'a' IN (0), 0 IN ('b'); -> 1, 1
Consider the case of a table based on expressions or where MySQL must internally store a value returned by IFNULL() in a temporary table: mysql> CREATE TABLE tmp SELECT IFNULL(1,'test') AS test; mysql> DESCRIBE tmp; +-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+ | Field | Type | Null | Key | Default | Extra | +-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+ | test ...
IN and = ANY are not synonyms when used with an expression list. IN can take an expression list, but = ANY cannot. See Section 12.4.2, “Comparison Functions and Operators”. NOT IN is not an alias for <> ANY, but for <> ALL. See Section 13.2.10.4, “Subqueries with ALL”.
