Search results
16 lis 2005 · South Africa: Supreme Court of Appeal. Road Accident Fund v Van Den Berg (19/2005) [2005] ZASCA 104; 2006 (2) SA 250 (SCA) (16 November 2005) In the matter between : ROAD ACCIDENT FUND Appellant and ERIKA VAN DEN BERG Respondent. Before: SCOTT, STREICHER & PONNAN JJA.
RAF v Van den Berg 2006 (2) SA 250 (SCA) Case. Course. law of delict (3041) 476 Documents. Students shared 476 documents in this course. University University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg. Academic year: 2023/2024. Uploaded by: Anonymous Student.
RAF v Van den Berg 2006 (2) SA 250 (SCA). Bell v RAF 2007 (6) SA 48 (SCA). RAF v Abrahams 2018 (5) SA 169 (SCA). sue the wrongdoing driver thanks to section 21 of the Act. What a time to be injured in South. Africa. Hopefully, the proposed Road Accident Benefit Scheme (RABS) that is intended to replace in
1 cze 2007 · Streicher JA in Road Accident Fund v Van Den Berg 5 endorsed this reasoning and described the test as being ‘the general purpose for which the vehicle, objectively determined, was conceived and constructed’.
22 mar 2007 · records that he has received bank cheques the drawer being The Chase Manhattan Private Bank & Trust Ltd from The Chase Manhattan Private Bank & Trust Ltd and confirm that the bank cheques are now legally in his possession, he acting for Global Finance SA.’
However, Streicher JA in Road Accident Fund v Van den Berg (2006 2 SA 250 (SCA) 253B-E) disagreed with this interpretation of Olivier JA’s decision and stated that in his view the judge was referring “to the general purpose for which the vehicle, objectively determined, was conceived and constructed”.
24 mar 2022 · The Supreme Court of Appeal (SCA) in The Road Accident Fund v Mbele [2020] ZASCA 72 (SCA judgment) had to decide whether a large industrial vehicle called a Reach Stacker was a motor vehicle as...
