Search results
At the end of Man of Steel, Superman breaks the neck of General Zod. My question is, how could he do that so easily? And why did none of the Kryptonians think about doing that to him? Especially, considering that they are a lot more ruthless and don't pay attention to morality, etc.
An excellent analysis of Man of Steel's ending that I found (I didn't write this, and I don't take any credit for it) Zod didn’t represent the last of Superman’s race. Zod was a programmed soldier created in a lab from the DNA of their ancient ancestors.
The ending of Man of Steel can be interpreted as a representation of Superman’s internal struggle to reconcile his humanity with his Kryptonian heritage. By making the difficult decision to kill Zod, Superman not only shows his willingness to protect Earth but also acknowledges the weight of his actions and the tragic consequences of his ...
Director Zack Snyder explains Man Of Steel's controversial ending. Superman killed Zod in the comics and the Donner movie. This isn't new. The main difference in Man of Steel is that he did it in such a visceral, brutal way. Zod didn't disappear down a chasm while Superman got to wink and smile.
6 lip 2013 · It's the final third - particularly the ending - of Man of Steel that has caused the most controversy, and in this exclusive excerpt from an interview with writer Mark Waid he discusses that...
Like Christopher Nolan’s Batman pictures, the Goyer-scripted “Man of Steel” reveals key moments in the hero’s development through flashbacks triggered by present-day traumas; a few parts almost seem to be unfolding along simultaneous timelines, the past and the present.
