Search results
22 wrz 2022 · Summary. Legal rules are either canonical or malleable. A canonical rule is fixed: it may not be expressed in different ways, may not evolve, and may not be subject to exceptions. Statutes are the paradigm form of canonical legal rules.
1 wrz 2022 · Common law rules are the paradigm form of malleable rules. Legal rules have a core and a penumbra. A common law rule can be articulated through more than one expression of the core of the...
Exceptions to the Part Payment Rule. The Common Law. Pinnel’s Case : Different ‘thing’: – ‘ a hawk, a horse, or a robe’. Confirmed in Sibree v Tripp: tender of a promissory note was a sufficient novelty to constitute consideration for the creditor’s promise to accept a lesser sum.
10 lis 2020 · Although textualism has in recent decades gained considerable prominence within the federal judiciary, 1 legal scholars remain skeptical: critics argue that textualism is insensitive to the actual workings of Congress, 2 overly rigid, 3 or (conversely) overly malleable 4 and thus not much different from its main competitor purposivism. 5 ...
Philosophers have argued ad nausea about the law of universal causation; they have also worked away on the problem of causal necessity and, more generally, on statements of natural law.
Malleability refers to the idea that the strength and scope of patent rights can be altered by the actors who interact with a patent well after it has issued. Patent law is full of mechanisms that allow for these post-issuance changes, yet there seems to be no good theoretical argument that supports malleability.
Facts. The defendant owed the claimant a sum of money. The defendant offered to pay half the amount in satisfaction of the full debt, and the claimant agreed. However, the claimant later changed their mind and sued for the remainder of the debt. Issue (s)
