Search results
Defendant claimed to be the legitimate child of an alleged common law marriage between Eli Keen, a white man, and Phoebe, a negro woman. There was judgment below for the plaintiff, which was affirmed by the supreme court. 184 Mo. 358. MR. JUSTICE Brown delivered the opinion of the Court.
KEEN v. KEEN is a case that was decided by the Supreme Court of the United States on April 2, 1906. The case was argued before the court on March 7, 1906. In a 9-0 ruling, the U.S. Supreme Court dismissed the case. The case originated from the Missouri State Trial Court.
In his concurrence in International Shoe, Justice Black warned that the doctrine announced in that decision might be used limit plaintiff’s access to courts.
6 lip 2021 · Kraemer, the Supreme Court had ruled that while private discrimination was not unconstitutional, state courts could not enforce restrictive covenants because this would constitute state action in discrimination.
19 mar 2007 · On March 6, 1857, Chief Justice Roger Taney issued what is widely regarded as the worst Supreme Court opinion ever. He noted that the question before the Court was whether African Americans are citizens of the United States and thus able to file suit in federal court.
COMPOSITION - SUPREME COURT OF INDIANA HOLDS THAT COMPUTERIZED JURY SELECTION SYSTEM DID NOT COMPLY WITH JURY SELECTION STATUTE. - Azania v. Indiana, 778 N.E.2d I253 (Ind. 2002). Courts have addressed the underrepresentation of African Ameri-cans in jury pools for over a century.' Although the facially race-based
8 lis 2019 · Indiana, 3 the Supreme Court finally held that the clause was incorporated against the states, 4 and further, that it encompassed civil forfeitures in addition to criminal fines. 5 Notwithstanding this expansion of rights, Timbs may be more notable for the protection it did not guarantee.
